![]() ![]() If there really is a Snowden Jnr, Bradley/Chelsea Manning, Mr Silk Rd 3.0, pedo image peddler, intelligence would-be whistleblower etc actually using AirVPN servers right now, then they are deluded if they think that sitting purely behind a VPN with 256-AES comm channels and 4096 RSA will do anything to keep an adversary from finding out what they are doing. I agree - they are not cracking the crypto directly, but undermining it and working around it. As far as we know, you don't keep logs also, but running Tor should be par for the course (zero trust model, sorry). I wouldn't have signed up otherwise - your rep is solid, and you haven't turned on anyone that we know of for pissy things like torrenting, reading censored materials and so on. I don't deny AirVPN puts everything into having the latest standards, protocols and so forth. All of these factors are why I don't ever pretend that sitting behind a VPN is any good against the government minders, except to keep out script kiddies, Kali Linux wannabe hackers, and to stop some basic profiling/tracking by corporates. Others have speculated that NSA has gained ability to crack 1024-bit RSA/DH keys. A GCHQ document warned however “These capabilities are among the SIGINT community’s most fragile, and the inadvertent disclosure of the simple ‘fact of’ could alert the adversary and result in immediate loss of the capability.” Another internal document stated that “there will be NO ‘need to know.’” Several experts, including Bruce Schneier and Christopher Soghoian, have speculated that a successful attack against RC4, a 1987 encryption algorithm still used in at least 50 per cent of all SSL/TLS traffic, is a plausible avenue, given several publicly known weaknesses of RC4. became the sole editor” of the standard.Įxperts also think successful attacks have been made against RC4, and that the NSA may be able to crack 1024-bit RSA keys.īy 2010, the NSA had developed “groundbreaking capabilities” against encrypted Internet traffic. Leaked NSA documents state that their effort was “a challenge in finesse” and that “Eventually, N.S.A. It was reported on Decemthat RSA had accepted a payment of $10 million from the NSA to set the random number generator as the default. While RSA Security has denied knowingly inserting a backdoor into BSAFE, it has not yet given an explanation for the continued usage of Dual_EC_DRBG after its flaws became apparent in 20. Even though this random number generator was known to be insecure and slow soon after the standard was published, and a potential NSA backdoor was found in 2007 while alternative random number generators without these flaws were certified and widely available, RSA Security continued using Dual_EC_DRBG in the company's BSAFE toolkit and Data Protection Manager until September 2013. The New York Times has reported that the random number generator Dual_EC_DRBG contains a back door from the NSA, which would allow the NSA to break encryption keys generated by the random number generator. Out of interest, why do we trust RSA either? See below - they have some explaining to do: The authors of one NSA presentation boast of a project called FOURSCORE that stores information including decrypted PPTP VPN metadata. Experts have considered PPTP insecure for some time now, but it is still in use in many commercial systems. ![]() Both seem to pose few problems for the NSA spies if they really want to crack a connection. The most widely used ones are called Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol (PPTP) and Internet Protocol Security (Ipsec). VPN connections can be based on a number of different protocols. ![]() In other words, by the end of 2011, the NSA's plans called for simultaneously surveilling 20,000 supposedly secure VPN communications per hour. The aim was for the system to be able to completely process "at least 20 percent" of these requests, meaning the data traffic would have to be decrypted and reinjected. This number was expected to increase to 100,000 per hour by the end of 2011. According to an NSA document dating from late 2009, the agency was processing 1,000 requests an hour to decrypt VPN connections. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |